MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2995648806 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0532

Rotating black string in Born–Infeld gravity’s rainbow

2019· article· en· W2995648806 on OpenAlexaffvenue
S. H. Hendi, Mehran Faraj Elahi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Quantum Research Center
FundersShiraz UniversityResearch Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics of Maragha
KeywordsPhysicsRainbowString (physics)Classical mechanicsBlack hole (networking)EinsteinBlack stringBlack hole thermodynamicsNonlinear systemTheoretical physicsRotation (mathematics)Mathematical physicsEntropy (arrow of time)Black braneExtremal black holeQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compact objects endowed with rotation and charge are interesting both from physical and mathematical points of view. Motivated by the recent interesting consequences of gravity’s rainbow, in this paper we introduce energy-dependent asymptotically anti-de Sitter black string solutions of Einstein–Born–Infeld gravity. We report the geometric properties of the solutions and generalize them to rotating black string solutions through an improper local transformation. We calculate the conserved and thermodynamic quantities of rotating black strings and examine the validity of the first law of thermodynamics. In addition, the effects of both rainbow functions and nonlinear electrodynamics on the thermodynamic behavior of the solutions will be studied. Finally, we investigate the thermal stability of the solutions using different methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→