MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995695943 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1917213116

Urban heating and canopy cover need to be considered as matters of environmental justice

2019· letter· en· W2995695943 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Drescher

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadicalizationIdeologyFilter (signal processing)Cover (algebra)AuditCanopyCriminologySociologyPolitical scienceMedia studiesComputer sciencePoliticsLawEngineeringBusinessEcologyBiologyMechanical engineeringAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ziter et al. (1) make a significant contribution to the understanding of temperature anomalies in a city of the northern United States. Their most important finding is that positive temperature anomalies were reduced most strongly in areas with canopy cover >40%. The authors call for increasing urban canopy cover, especially in areas that already have 40% canopy cover. However, the work would be strengthened by considerations of the realities of urban form, urban forest dynamics, human behavior, and environmental justice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207