MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2995702961 · doi:10.11575/prism/37360

Osteology and Histology of Plesiosaurs (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Non-marine (Fluvial to Estuarine) and Marine Depositional Environments

2019· dissertation· en· W2995702961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James A. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialOsteologySedimentary depositional environmentEstuaryGeologyPaleontologyBiologyOceanographyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plesiosaurs are a highly diverse group of secondarily-aquatic reptiles that lived from Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous time. Plesiosaurs are known primarily from marine deposits, but also occur sparingly in non-marine units. Here, I describe the osteology and histology of plesiosaurs from both non-marine (Dinosaur Park Formation, DPF) and marine (Bearpaw and Pierre Shale Formations; BF, PSF), Upper Cretaceous-aged deposits of western Canada. These sediments were deposited in the Western Interior Basin, which was inundated by a large marine corridor known as the Western Interior Seaway. Non-marine (fluvial to estuarine) sediments of the DPF have yielded a stratigraphically extensive collection of elasmosaurid plesiosaur specimens. These specimens are notable as they belong to individuals that are small-bodied relative to some elasmosaurid specimens from marine units. In this study, I test whether the small-bodiedness of DPF specimens is due to the presence of immature individuals or a small-bodied taxon. Analyses of select DPF elasmosaurid specimens indicate the presence of a small-bodied taxon. Furthermore, a well-preserved partial skeleton from this unit is recognized as the holotype of a new genus and species. The holotype and referred specimens span both estuarine and fluvial sediments and may indicate an example of niche-partitioning within the predominantly marine Plesiosauria. The small body size is also consistent with those of plesiosaurs from other non-marine units. I also describe select elasmosaurid and polycotylid specimens from the BF and PSF, respectively. One elasmosaurid belongs to a large-bodied taxon which may be closely-related to, or possibly conspecific with, the DPF taxon. Another elasmosaurid belongs to a small-bodied, likely new, taxon. The two polycotylids were originally considered to be a juvenile and adult of Dolichorhynchops bonneri, based on their similar morphologies and large discrepancy in size. However, both specimens are osteologically mature, possibly reflecting interspecific differences; alternatively, these body size differences may be due to sexual dimorphism. Finally, this dissertation constitutes one of the first histological studies on plesiosaurs from non-marine units and Canada. This study also contributes to our limited understanding of plesiosaur ontogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→