MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2995722199 · doi:10.1101/2019.12.13.875211

Anillin/Mid1p interacts with the ECSRT-associated protein Vps4p and mitotic kinases to regulate cytokinesis in fission yeast

2019· preprint· en· W2995722199 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Imane M. Rezig, Gwyn W. Gould, Christopher McInerny

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterMcGill University
KeywordsCytokinesisCell biologySchizosaccharomyces pombeMitosisSeptinSchizosaccharomycesBiologyCell divisionAurora B kinaseESCRTKinasePLK1Cell cyclePolo-like kinaseCellYeastSaccharomyces cerevisiaeEndosomeGeneticsIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cytokinesis is the final stage of the cell cycle which separates cellular constituents to produce two daughter cells. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe we have investigated the role of various classes of proteins involved in this process. Central to these is anillin/Mid1p which forms a ring-like structure at the cell equator that predicts the site of cell separation through septation in fission yeast. Here we demonstrate a direct physical interaction between Mid1p and the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-associated protein Vps4p. The interaction is essential for cell viability, and Vps4p is required for the correct cellular localization of Mid1p. Furthermore, we show that Mid1p is phosphorylated by the aurora kinase Aurora A, that the interaction of mid1 and ark1 genes is essential for cell viability, and that Ark1p is also required for the correct cellular localization of Mid1p. We mapped the sites of phosphorylation of Mid1p by Aurora A and the polo kinase Plk1 and assessed their importance by mutational analysis. Mutational analysis revealed S332, S523 and S531 to be required for Mid1p function and its interaction with Vps4p, Ark1p and Plo1p. Combined our data suggest a physical interaction between Mip1p and Vps4p important for cytokinesis, and identify phosphorylation of Mid1p by aurora and polo kinases as being significant for this process. Author summary Replication is a property of all living cells, with cell separation, so-called cytokinesis, the final step in the process. A large number of proteins have been identified that are required for cytokinesis, but in many cases it is not understand how they interact and regulate each other. In this research we have analysed two classes of proteins founds in all eukaryotic cells with central roles in cytokinesis: the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) proteins and the anillin protein Mid1p. We identify a direct physical interaction between the ESCRT protein Vps4 and anillin/Mid1p, and explore how it regulates cytokinesis. Midp1 activity is shown to controlled by the protein kinase Ark1p by direct phosphorylation, and this phosphorylation is important for Mid1p function. These observations identify new ways in which ESCRT and anillin/Mid1p control cell separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→