Characterization of cathepsin S exosites that govern its elastolytic activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously determined that the elastolytic activities of cathepsins (Cat) K and V require two exosites sharing the same structural localization on both enzymes. The structural features involved in the elastolytic activity of CatS have not yet been identified. We first mutated the analogous CatK and V putative exosites of CatS into the elastolytically inactive CatL counterparts. The modification of the exosite 1 did not affect the elastase activity of CatS whilst mutation of the Y118 of exosite 2 decreased the cleavage of elastin by ∼70% without affecting the degradation of other macromolecular substrates (gelatin, thyroglobulin). T06, an ectosteric inhibitor that disrupt the elastolytic activity of CatK, blocked ∼80% of the elastolytic activity of CatS without blocking the cleavage of gelatin and thyroglobulin. Docking studies showed that T06 preferentially interacts with a binding site located on the Right domain of the enzyme, outside of the active site. The structural examination of this binding site showed that the loop spanning the L174N175G176K177 residues of CatS is considerably different from that of CatL. Mutation of this loop into the CatL-like equivalent decreased elastin degradation by ∼70% and adding the Y118 mutation brought down the loss of elastolysis to ∼80%. In addition, the Y118 mutation selectively reduced the cleavage of the basement membrane component laminin by ∼50%. In summary, our data show that the degradation of elastin by CatS requires two exosites where one of them is distinct from those of CatK and V whilst the cleavage of laminin requires only one exosite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".