MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2995864758 · doi:10.1142/s0219265919500087

Traversal with Enumeration of Geometric Graphs in Bounded Space

2019· article· en· W2995864758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interconnection Networks · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeometric graph theoryGraph traversalTree traversalVertex (graph theory)Spatial networkBounded functionGraphEnumerationPath graphEdge-graceful labeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we provide an algorithm for traversing geometric graphs which visits all vertices and reports every vertex and edge exactly once. To achieve this, we combine a given geometric graph G with the integer lattice, seen as a graph, in such a way that the resulting hypothetical graph can be traversed using a known algorithm which is based on face routing. To overcome the problem with hypothetical vertices and edges, we develop an algorithm for visiting any k-th neighborhood of a vertex in a graph straight-line drawn in the plane using O(k log k) memory. The memory needed to complete the traversal of a geometric graph then turns out to depend on the maximum graph distance among pairs of distinct vertices of G whose Euclidean distance is greater than one and less than [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it