Erotic Words, Sacred Landscapes, Ideal Bodies: Love and Death in the Song of Songs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Song of Songs, composed probably in the third century bce , is one of the most influential poems in the Western erotic and mystical traditions, by virtue of its appearing in the Bible. It is a dialogue between two lovers in an idyllic pastoral landscape, seemingly without relation to the rest of the sacred text. It is, however, a critique of the biblical tradition, whose implicit question is: what was it all worth? For the Song, the answer is that love alone guarantees an ambiguous immortality. It is thus a tacit counter to Ecclesiastes' refrain that everything is illusory. I discuss the instability of gender in the Song and its questioning of patriarchy, to create a vulnerable maternal space for lovers' intimacy. This space is that of the poetic imagination, which is more real than the everyday world. The metaphors coalescence with the sound patterns of the Song to generate a synthesis of the body, the landscape, history, and the fauna and flora of ancient Israel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".