Hierarchical coded matrix multiplication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Slow working nodes, known as stragglers, can greatly reduce the speed of distributed computation. Coded matrix multiplication is a recently introduced technique that enables straggler-resistant distributed multiplication of large matrices. A key property is that the finishing time depends only on the work completed by a set of the fastest workers, while the work done by the slowest workers is ignored completely. This paper is motivated by the observation that in real-world commercial cloud computing systems such as Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) the distinction between fast and slow nodes is often a soft one. Thus, if we could also exploit the work completed by stragglers we may realize substantial performance gains. To realize such gains, in this paper we use the idea of hierarchical coding (Ferdinand and Draper, IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory, 2018). We decompose the overall matrix multiplication task into a hierarchy of heterogeneously sized subtasks. The duty to complete each subtask is shared amongst all workers and each subtask is (generally) of a different complexity. The motivation for the hierarchical decomposition is the recognition that more workers will finish the first subtask than the second (or third, forth, etc.). Connecting to error correction coding, earlier subtasks can therefore be designed to be of a higher rate than later subtasks. Through this hierarchical design our scheme exploits the work completed by stragglers, rather than ignoring it, even if that amount is much less than that completed by the fastest workers. We numerically show that our method realizes a 60% improvement in the expected finishing time for a widely studied statistical model of the speed of computation and, on Amazon EC2, the gain is 35%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".