Temporal evolution and spatial distribution of quantitative T2 MRI following acute ischemia reperfusion injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Determining mechanisms of secondary stroke injury related to cerebral blood flow and the severity of microvascular injury contributing to edema and blood-brain barrier breakdown will be critical for the development of adjuvant therapies for revascularization treatment. Aim To characterize the heterogeneity of the ischemic lesion using quantitative T2 imaging along with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) within five hours of treatment. Methods Quantitative T2 magnetic resonance imaging was acquired within 5 h (baseline) and at 24 h (follow-up) of stroke treatment in 29 patients. Dynamic contrast enhanced permeability imaging was performed at baseline in a subgroup of patients. Absolute volume change and lesion percent change was determined for the quantitative T2, DWI, and absolute volume change sequences. A Gaussian process with RRELIEFF feature selection algorithm was used for prediction of relative quantitative T2 and DWI lesion growth, baseline and follow-up quantitative T2/DWI lesion ratios, and also NIHSS at 24 h and change in NIHSS from admission to 24 h. Results In n = 27 patients, median (interquartile range) lesion percent change was 114.8% (48.9%, 259.1%) for quantitative T2, 48.2% (−12.6%, 179.6%) for absolute volume change, and 62.7% (26.3%, 230.9%) for DWI, respectively. Our model, consisting of baseline NIHSS, CT ASPECTS, and systolic blood pressure, showed a strong correlation with quantitative T2 percent change (cross correlation R 2 = 0.80). There was a strong predictive ability for quantitative T2/DWI lesion ratio at 24 h using baseline NIHSS and last seen normal to 24 h magnetic resonance imaging time (cross correlation R 2 = 0.93). Baseline dynamic contrast enhanced permeability was moderately correlated to the baseline quantitative T2 values (rho = 0.38). Conclusion Quantitative T2 imaging provides critical information for development of therapeutic approaches that could ameliorate microvascular damage during ischemia reperfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".