Collision‐Induced Absorption of CH <sub>4</sub> ‐CO <sub>2</sub> and H <sub>2</sub> ‐CO <sub>2</sub> Complexes and Their Effect on the Ancient Martian Atmosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Experimental measurements of collision‐induced absorption (CIA) cross sections for CO 2 ‐H 2 and CO 2 ‐CH 4 complexes were performed using Fourier transform spectroscopy over a spectral range of 150–475 cm −1 and a temperature range of 200–300 K. These experimentally derived CIA cross sections agree with the spectral range of the calculation by Wordsworth et al. (2017) however, the amplitude is half of what was predicted. Furthermore, the CIA cross sections reported here agree with those measured by Turbet et al. (2019, 2019). Additionally, radiative transfer calculations of the early Mars atmosphere were performed, and showed that CO 2 ‐CH 4 CIA would require surface pressure greater than 3 bar for a 10% methane atmosphere to achieve 273 K at the surface. For CO 2 ‐H 2 , liquid water is possible with 5% hydrogen and less than 2 bar of surface pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".