MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Czesław Miłosz in the World: The Will to Transcendence

2019· other· en· W2996148356 on OpenAlex
Magdalena Kay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueA Companion to World Literature · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCentral European Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessWonderTranscendence (philosophy)BeautyPhilosophyReputationHistoricismAestheticsEpistemologyLiteratureArtSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Czesław Miłosz's nearly mythic life not only affects his position in the global literary landscape but colors his thinking about the dangerous pressure of historicism and the poignant beauty of “eternal” yet evanescent moments. He longs to believe in sacredness, and tries to make us see why we cannot do without such a concept. Perhaps it is no wonder that he has garnered a reputation as a moralist and historical witness even while he strenuously objects to both labels, wishing to be seen as a poet – no more, no less – and a celebrant of the mortal world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it