<i>Drosophila</i> PDGF/VEGF signaling from muscles to hepatocyte-like cells protects against obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract PDGF/VEGF ligands regulate a plethora of biological processes in multicellular organisms via autocrine, paracrine and endocrine mechanisms. Here, we investigated organ-specific roles of Drosophila PDGF/VEGF-like factors (Pvfs). We combine genetic approaches and single-nuclei sequencing to demonstrate that muscle-derived Pvf1 signals to the Drosophila hepatocyte-like cells/oenocytes to suppress lipid synthesis by activating the Pi3K/Akt1/mTOR signaling cascade in the oenocytes. Additionally, we show that this signaling axis regulates the rapid expansion of adipose tissue lipid stores observed in newly eclosed flies. Flies emerge after pupation with limited adipose tissue lipid stores and lipid levels are progressively restored via lipid synthesis. We find that pvf1 expression in the adult muscle increase rapidly during this stage and that muscle-to-oenocyte Pvf1 signaling inhibits restoration of adipose tissue lipid stores as the process reaches completion. Our findings provide the first evidence in a metazoan of a PDGF/VEGF ligand acting as a myokine that regulates systemic lipid homeostasis by activating mTOR in hepatocyte-like cells. Highlights Muscle specific Pvf1 protects mature adult flies from obesity Single-nuclei RNA sequencing reveals that PvR, the receptor for Pvf1, is highly expressed in the Drosophila hepatocyte-like cells/oenocytes. PvR is required specifically in oenocytes to protect adult flies from obesity Muscle-to-oenocyte Pvf1 signaling activates PvR/Pi3K/Akt1/mTOR in the oenocytes to suppress lipid synthesis Muscle-derived Pvf1 helps terminate the rapid expansion of adipose tissue lipid stores in newly eclosed flies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".