Seismic Fragility Assessment and Resilience of Reinforced Masonry Flanged Wall Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several experimental and analytical studies have evaluated the seismic response of reinforced masonry (RM) shear walls either as a component (i.e., planar rectangular walls) or as a system (i.e., building consisting planar walls). In the current study, five RM flanged walls were assessed for their seismic performance and collapse capacity. The impact of utilizing flanged walls was assessed and characterized through recent available guidelines. In this respect, a 2-D fiber-based modeling approach has been developed using the Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation software. The results indicate that the selected RM flanged walls can satisfy the acceptable criteria proposed by the methodology. The seismic resilience of the archetypes against the expected collapse risk was evaluated in terms of functionality curves before and after the use of the flanges in the walls. Damage levels were considered as performance level functions correlated to earthquake intensity and were used to estimate total loss and recovery time of the archetypes. The selected RM flanged walls showed enhanced earthquake resilience and less damage than rectangular RM shear walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it