MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996203322 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2019.8926086

A Miniature 16-element Endoscopic Histotripsy Transducer with Electronically Steerable Focus

2019· article· en· W2996203322 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Mallay, Jeffrey Woodacre, Taha Take, Emily Napier, Sandra Gorgey, Jeremy Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerMaterials scienceLens (geology)OpticsFocal lengthCavitationFinite element methodAcousticsBiomedical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 5 mm by 5 mm 16-element histotripsy transducer was built and tested using a lens bonded to an air-backed 1-3 piezoelectric composite. The transducer was driven by a custom designed 16 channel pulse generator. Both aluminum and methacrylate photopolymer (resin) lens designs were modelled using a COMSOL FEM model. A resin lens was 3D printed and used to fabricate a transducer array with a focus that could be steered over a greater area than the aluminum lens design. The resin lens transducer had a peak negative pressure trend of 5.7 MPa/100 V. The -3 dB focal length and width were 1.94 mm and 0.30 mm. A pulse sequence cycling through 5 foci spaced within a 1.5 mm square was used to ablate ex vivo rat brain tissue through shock scattering cavitation near the surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207