26 Initial Orthostatic Hypotension in Older Persons: Results from the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH) is defined as a reduction in systolic or diastolic blood pressure (1) of 40 mmHg or 20 mmHg or greater within 15 seconds of standing. However, little is known about the characteristics of individuals with IOH and its relevance in the older population. The present study aimed to determine factors associated with IOH and classical orthostatic hypotension (COH) and their relationship with physical, functional and cognitive performance. Design Cross-sectional observational study. Setting and Participants Individuals aged ≥55 years were recruited through the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR) study and continuous non-invasive BP was monitored over five minutes of supine rest and three minutes of standing. Measures Physical performance was measured using timed up and go, functional reach (FR), hand grip (HG) and Lawton’s functional ability scale; cognition was measured with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). BP response to standing was categorized as non-OH, COH, IOH or COH and IOH Results 1245 participants were recruited, 623 (50%) had COH, 165 (13%) had IOH and 145 (12%) met the criteria for COH and IOH. COH was associated with increasing age, hypertension, transient ischemic attacks, diabetes mellitus, anti-hypertensive medications and reduced functional reach compared to individuals without COH. IOH was associated with younger age, normo-tension, and the absence of cerebrovascular disease or diabetes. Individuals with IOH had significantly better TUG, FR and HG scores compared to individuals without IOH. Conclusions This study suggests that IOH is associated with better physical performance. Further research is now required to fully elucidate the clinical relevance of IOH and its relationship to COH, as well as determine appropriate clinical cut-offs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".