MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996234940 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958827

Brain-Inspired Intelligence for Real-Time Health Situation Understanding in Smart e-Health Home Applications

2019· article· en· W2996234940 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahdi Naghshvarianjahromi, Shiva Kumar, M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCoral Reef Conservation ProgramNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDecision treeAutonomic computingCognitive computingCognitionHealth careDecision support systemHome automationDynamic decision-makingMachine learningArtificial intelligenceRisk analysis (engineering)Human–computer interactionComputer securityMedicineCloud computingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The autonomic computing layer of the smart e-Health home based on a cognitive dynamic system (CDS) can be a solution for improving health situation understanding, reducing the healthcare system costs, and improving people's quality of life. It can also be a solution for reducing the large number of sudden deaths outside of a hospital due to fatal diseases such as Arrhythmia. Towards this objective, we start from understanding the health situation, by diagnosing healthy and unhealthy persons. For this, we developed a decision-making system that is inspired by the medical doctors (MDs) decision-making processes. Our system is based on a CDS for cognitive decision-making and it can create a decision-making tree automatically. The simple, low complexity algorithmic design of the proposed system makes it suitable for real-time applications. A proof-of-concept case study of the implementation of the CDS was done on Arrhythmia disease. An accuracy of 95.4% was achieved using the proposed algorithms. Also, these algorithms can make a decision in less than 80 ms, and for one User, this includes the time for training. The proposed platform can be extended for more healthcare applications such as screening, disease class diagnosis, prevention, treatment, or monitoring healing. As a result, the proposed CDS algorithms can be an example of the first step for designing the autonomic computing layer of a smart e-Health home platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207