MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996267122 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2019.31014

Research on the Operation Mode of Practical Teaching in Application-Oriented Universities based on the Orientation of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education

2019· article· en· W2996267122 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deng Xinyuan, Yang Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Educational Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University
KeywordsTeamworkEnthusiasmConsciousnessQuality (philosophy)Knowledge managementEntrepreneurshipCognitionOrientation (vector space)Mode (computer interface)PsychologyEngineering ethicsEngineeringPedagogyEngineering managementComputer scienceBusinessManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practical teaching plays an important role in the study of professional knowledge in colleges and universities. Based on the actual situation and related characteristics of professional practice in application-oriented universities, this paper investigates and analyzes students' cognition and demand orientation of professional practice teaching, and then constructs a professional practice service team mode integrating project design - task driven - ability oriented - practice innovation. In this way, students' learning enthusiasm can be aroused, their innovation consciousness and teamwork consciousness can be cultivated, their practical ability can be improved, and their comprehensive quality can be expanded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.455 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicInnovative Educational TechniquesFrench-language works237,207