MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2996362615 · doi:10.1101/2019.12.20.884593

DHX9-dependent recruitment of BRCA1 to RNA is required to promote DNA end resection in homologous recombination

2019· preprint· en· W2996362615 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Prasun Chakraborty, Kevin Hiom

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of DundeeMcGill University
KeywordsHelicaseHomologous recombinationRAD51RNA Helicase ADNA repairBiologyDNA damageDNAReplication protein ARNACell biologyMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneDNA-binding protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract DExD/H-box helicase 9 (DHX9/RNA helicaseA) is ubiquitously expressed ATP-dependent helicase that unwinds a variety of complex DNA and RNA secondary structures, suggesting it might have a role in DNA replication and the repair of DNA damage. Here we identify a pivotal role for DHX9 in homologous recombination (HR). Cells that are deficient in DHX9 are impaired in the generation of single stranded DNA (ssDNA) by DNA end resection. Consequently these cells fail to recruit RPA and RAD51 to sites of DNA damage and are hypersensitive to treatment with the DNA damaging agents camptothecin and Olaparib. A critical early step in the initiation of HR is the recruitment of BRCA1 mediator protein to DNA damage to promote DNA resection. We show here that recruitment of BRCA1 to DNA damage foci is dependent on its interaction with DHX9 to form the BRCA1-D complex, which binds to nascent RNA. Together our data identify a pivotal role for DHX9 in homologous recombination and highlight the important contribution of RNA in the recruitment of BRCA1 to DNA damage for the repair of DNA breaks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→