MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996414405 · doi:10.3138/cjpe.52185

Évaluation de la mise en œuvre du programme d'intervention <i>In vivo</i> chez les jeunes de 11–12 ans d'une école primaire québécoise présentant un problème de comportements intériorisés : une étude exploratoire

2019· article· en· W2996414405 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Catherine Fréchette‐Simard, Jonathan Bluteau, Isabelle Plante

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Program Evaluation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMental healthAnxietyPsychotherapistPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Internalized disorders are the most current mental health issue during childhood and adolescence. This study sought to assess the implementation of In vivo, an elementary school program aiming to treat anxiety with stress management strategies. The study is based on a mixed method design and collected data from the students experiencing the program (n=4, 11-12 y. o.), their parents (n=4), and other school staff members involved (n=7). The findings of the study show that the program is relevant in this specific context and also highlight the obstacles and facilitators to implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Program EvaluationSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207