Accelerating our response: Government of Canada five-year action plan on sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI)-which include HIV, hepatitis B and C, chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis and human papillomavirus-remain significant public health issues both nationally and globally.In 2018, a Pan-Canadian STBBI Framework for Action (the Framework) was released by federal, provincial and territorial governments to provide an overarching and comprehensive approach to addressing STBBI for all those involved.This includes all levels of government, First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities and leadership, frontline service providers, clinicians, public health practitioners, non-governmental organizations and researchers.The Framework includes strategic goals, guiding principles and pillars for action to address STBBI in Canada.In response, the Government of Canada released its own action plan in July 2019: Accelerating Our Response -Government of Canada Five-Year Action Plan on Sexually Transmitted and Blood-Borne Infections (the Action Plan).This document identifies seven priority areas for federal action on STBBI over the next five years: 1) moving toward truth and reconciliation with First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples; 2) stigma and discrimination; 3) community innovation-putting a priority on prevention; 4) reaching the undiagnosed-increasing access to STBBI testing; 5) providing prevention, treatment and care to populations that receive health services or coverage of health care benefits from the federal government; 6) leveraging existing knowledge and targeting future research; and 7) measuring impact-monitoring and reporting on trends and results.The Government of Canada is currently working with provincial and territorial governments, First Nations, Inuit and Métis partners, and other stakeholders to develop STBBI indicators and targets for the Canadian context that are appropriate, feasible and measurable against the shared strategic goals of the Framework and the Action Plan.In addition, the Government of Canada has also committed to reporting annually on its progress in implementing the priority areas laid out in the Action Plan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.017 | 0.020 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".