MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996458797

Véhicules zéro émission et lutte contre les changements climatiques: survol des tendances et politiques à l’échelle mondiale

2019· article· fr· W2996458797 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annie Chaloux, Philippe Simard, Catherine Laflamme, Philippe Larivière

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le secteur des transports est le deuxième principal émetteur mondial de gaz à effet de serre.Depuis les cinq dernières années, l’électrification des transports et la question des voitures électriques sont devenues des enjeux très en vogue dans le cadre des négociations climatiques internationales, autant auprès desgouvernements centraux que noncentraux. D’ailleurs, la province de Québec est de ceux exerçant un grand leadership en matière d’électromobilitéà l’échelle mondiale.Cette note de recherche fait un état des lieux des principaux engagements internationaux et des nombreuses initiatives et tendances mondiales dans le secteur de l’électrification des transports. Elle explore égalementdes cas de gouvernements centraux et non centraux, tels la Norvège, l’État de la Californie et l’Écosse,ayant développé des politiques innovantes en matière d’électromobilité. Finalement,elle identifieles bonnes pratiques applicables au Québec.Parallèlement, cette note de recherchetémoigne dela marge de manœuvre ainsi que de l’éventail de possibilités dont disposent les gouvernements non centraux pour participer à l’édification du complexe de régimes internationauxtraitant des changements climatiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)Same topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207