MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996468410 · doi:10.7202/1066192ar

La pulsion de mort dans le champ du fanatisme idéologique

2019· article· fr· W2996468410 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monique Lauret

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le concept de pulsion de mort a été introduit par Freud au début du xx e siècle, suite aux dégâts humains de la Première Guerre mondiale et en pleine montée de la haine et des forces pulsionnelles destructrices qui se sont déchainées pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Ce concept aide à penser les nouvelles problématiques que nous rencontrons aujourd’hui avec l’éclosion violente d’une nouvelle idéologie extrémiste islamiste, le wahhabisme littéraliste. Cette idéologie s’appuie sur un discours religieux réinterprété et fanatisé, prônant l’ultraviolence et la terreur avec un discours propagandiste qui oeuvre à une rupture à l’encontre de la Démocratie et menace la civilisation occidentale. Des points communs entre l’idéologie maoïste et l’idéologie nazie sont aussi recherchés pour tenter de penser cette nouvelle idéologie destructrice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207