MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2996496040 · doi:10.1101/2019.12.19.882464

Role of adenosine in functional recovery following anoxic coma in <i>Locusta migratoria</i>

2019· preprint· en· W2996496040 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel A. Van Dusen, Christopher Lanz, R. Meldrum Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdenosineDepolarizationCaffeineAdenosine receptorAdenosine receptor antagonistExtracellularComa (optics)NeuroscienceBiologyNeurotransmissionAdenosine A1 receptorBiophysicsChemistryReceptorCell biologyEndocrinologyBiochemistryAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When exposed to prolonged anoxia insects enter a reversible coma during which neural and muscular systems temporarily shut down. Nervous system shut down is a result of spreading depolarization throughout neurons and glial cells. Upon return to normoxia, recovery occurs following the restoration of ion gradients. However, there is a delay in the functional recovery of synaptic transmission following membrane repolarization. In mammals, the build-up of extracellular adenosine following spreading depolarization contributes to this delay. Adenosine accumulation is a marker of metabolic stress and it has many downstream effects through the activation of adenosine receptors. Here we demonstrate that adenosine lengthens the time to functional recovery following anoxic coma in locusts. Caffeine, used as an adenosine receptor antagonist, decreased the time to recovery in intact animals and lengthened the time to recovery in semi-intact animals. Our results show that the rate of recovery in insect systems is affected by the presence of adenosine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→