Bibliographic record
Abstract
The placenta is evaluated to understand fetal health, and emerging evidence indicates that maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) features may provide clues to women's later life cardiovascular risk.Pathologic changes that directly involve the maternal vascular supply to the placenta, collectively termed decidual vasculopathy, develop early in gestation, and their effects on maternal blood flow to the placenta may be etiologic for the other MVM findings.A second group of MVM lesions includes those entities that likely arise subsequently in the pregnancy as a result of hypoxic/ischemic injury and oxidative damage to the placenta (small placental size, villous infarction, retroplacental hemorrhage, accelerated villous maturation, and distal villous hypoplasia).MVM lesions are detected in each of the great obstetric syndromes, and emerging evidence suggests that decidual vasculopathy may be linked to future pregnancy complications, maternal dyslipidemia, higher blood pressure, and increased vascular resistance years after delivery.Identification of the mechanisms leading to decidual vasculopathy may improve pregnancy health and contribute new sex-specific insights regarding the etiology of cardiovascular disease in women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".