MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996546232 · doi:10.1212/cpj.0000000000000785

Can an epilepsy transfer clinic be sustained in the United States?

2020· editorial· en· W2996546232 on OpenAlex
W. Allen Hauser, Carol Camfield, Peter Camfield

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Clinical Practice · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyPsychosocialPsychiatryMedicinePsychologyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the United States, over the next year, approximately 25,000 teens with epilepsy will turn 18.1 Most will have psychosocial issues and/or conditions comorbid with epilepsy, for which physicians familiar with epilepsy are used to dealing with.2 Approximately half of this number will have ongoing seizures requiring care by a knowledgeable professional and will benefit from a comprehensive approach to management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.114
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.114
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0070.038
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it