MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2996633715 · doi:10.1109/cwit.2019.8929904

On Source-Channel Communication over Multiple-Access Interference Relay Channels with Phase Uncertainties

2019· article· en· W2996633715 on OpenAlexaff
Subhajit Majhi, Meysam Shahrbaf Motlagh, Patrick Mitran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayErgodic theoryFadingChannel (broadcasting)Relay channelComputer scienceInterference (communication)Topology (electrical circuits)GaussianCo-channel interferencePhase (matter)Coding (social sciences)Computer networkTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringStatisticsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the Gaussian multiple-access interference relay channel (MAIRC), where a relay aids the communication of two two-user multiple-access channels that transmit over a shared medium and thus interfere mutually. We study the problem of transmitting four correlated memoryless sources, one each for the four transmitters, over the phase incoherent MAIRCs (PI-MAIRC) where transmissions are subject to fixed non-ergodic phase shifts that change across blocks. For a class of PI-MAIRCs where the phase-shifts are assumed to be unknown at the transmitters and known at the receivers, necessary and sufficient channel conditions are derived under which separate source and channel coding proves optimal. We then extend this result to (i) the N-user PI-MAIRC as well as (ii) MAIRCs with general ergodic phase fading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→