MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996679522 · doi:10.2340/16501977-2639

Commentary on: Accuracy of examination of the long head of the biceps tendon in the clinical setting: A systematic review

2019· review· en· W2996679522 on OpenAlexaff
Shahbaz S. Malik, Robert W. Jordan, Adnan Saithna

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPan Am Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiceps tendonBicepsHead (geology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyMedicinePhysical examinationTendonPsychologySurgeryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Missing (letter)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.231
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.231
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0330.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Rehabilitation MedicineSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207