MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996726760 · doi:10.1002/qre.2595

CUSUM control charts with variable sampling interval for monitoring the ratio of two normal variables

2019· article· en· W2996726760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality and Reliability Engineering International · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCUSUMEWMA chartControl chartX-bar chartStatisticsChartInterval (graph theory)Control limitsStatistical process controlShewhart individuals control chartComputer scienceVariable (mathematics)Sampling (signal processing)MathematicsProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In many industrial manufacturing processes, the ratio between two normal random variables plays a key role in ensuring quality of products. Thus, monitoring this ratio is an important task that is well worth considering. In this paper, we combine a variable sampling interval (VSI) strategy with a cumulative sum (CUSUM) scheme to create a new type of control chart for purpose of tracking the ratio between two normal variables. The average time to signal ( A T S ) and the expected average time to signal ( E A T S ) criteria are used to evaluate the performance of the new VSI CUSUM RZ control chart. The numerical results show that the proposed control chart has much more attractive performance in comparison with the standard CUSUM‐RZ control chart and the VSI EWMA‐RZ control chart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it