WILAYAH RENTAN TERHADAP GEMPABUMI DI KABUPATEN PANDEGLANG BAGIAN BARAT (STUDI KASUS SEBAGIAN KECAMATAN CIGEULIS, CIMANGGU DAN SUMUR)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Untuk mengurangi kerusakan akibat bencana gempa di Kabupaten Pandeglang, wilayah bahaya gempabumi dan kerentanan terhadap gempabumi harus ditentukan. Wilayah bahaya gempa di Kabupaten Pandeglang ditentukan oleh nilai PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration), struktur geologi, litologi dan kemiringan lereng. Untuk mengetahui daerah bahaya gempa, metode skoring dan analisis spasial digunakan. Setelah menentukan daerah bahaya gempa, maka grid yang mewakili daerah bahaya gempa dapat diidentifikasi. Bahaya gempa, kepadatan dan kualitas bangunan di permukiman daerah penelitian diidentifikasi oleh sistem grid dan survei. Wilayah rentan terhadap gempabumi di sebelah barat Kabupaten Pandeglang (studi kasus: sebagian Cigeulis, Cimanggu dan Sumur) ditentukan dengan menganalisis bahaya gempa, kepadatan dan kualitas bangunan. Sehingga dapat diketahui daerah dengan kerentanan tinggi, sedang dan rendah di daerah penelitian. Wilayah dengan kerentanan tinggi terhadap gempabumi terletak di permukiman Kecamatan Sumberjaya Kecamatan Sumur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it