MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996757734 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.9b01306

4,4′-Dipyridyl Dioxide·SbF<sub>3</sub> Cocrystal: Pnictogen Bond Prevails over Halogen and Hydrogen Bonds in Driving Self-Assembly

2019· article· en· W2996757734 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Scilabra, Giancarlo Terraneo, Andrea Daolio, Alberto Baggioli, Antonino Famulari, César Leroy, David L. Bryce, Giuseppe Resnati

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCocrystalPnictogenChemistryHydrogen bondHalogen bondHalogenNucleophileCrystallographyCrystal engineeringPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryMoleculeCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SbF 3 ·4,4′-dipyridyl N, N ′-dioxide cocrystal is prepared and characterized via infrared spectroscopy and 121 Sb and 123 Sb nuclear quadrupole resonance. Single crystal X-ray analysis proves that a major role in cocrystal formation is played by Sb···O pnictogen bonds, the attractive interactions wherein antimony and oxygen act as the electrophilic and nucleophilic sites, respectively. Molecular electrostatic potential and natural bond orbital analyses confirm the relevance of this interaction in the self-assembly process. Dipyridyl dioxide also forms hydrogen bonded and halogen bonded cocrystal, e.g., when water and 1,4-diiodo-tetrafluoro-benzene function as acceptors of electron density. Experiments of competitive cocrystal formation indicate that under the adopted conditions the pnictogen bond prevails over the halogen bond and the hydrogen bond in identifying the tecton involved in cocrystal formation with dipyridyl dioxide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207