MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996778162 · doi:10.25105/psia.v1i1.5975

STUDI LOKASI RAWAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS DI JALANRAYA BOGOR SEKSI KEDUNG HALANG – PABUARAN

2019· article· id· W2996778162 on OpenAlexaff
Ilya Tri Asmara

Bibliographic record

VenueProsiding Seminar Intelektual Muda · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengidentifikasi lokasi rawan kecelakaan lalu lintas sepanjang 13 km yakni dari Kedung Halang – Pabuaran . Dilanjutkan menganalisis data korban Meninggal Dunia (MD), Luka Berat (LB), Luka Ringan (LR), Kendaraan terlibat (K) yang terdata lokasi rawan kecelakaan di Jalan Raya Bogor seksi Kedung Halang – Pabuaran. Setelah itu, dianalisis dengan metode angka kecelakaan (AEK) dan batas kendali atas (BKA). Hasilnya terdapat 4 segmen rawan kecelakaan pada STA 7, STA 8, STA 9, dan STA 12. Penerapan marka kejut, penutupan arus putar balik (U-TURN), melengkapi rambu lalu lintas, penambahan lampu penerangan jalan umum (LPJU), penerapan zona selamat sekolah (ZoSS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProsiding Seminar Intelektual MudaSame topicUrban Transport Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207