MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996804334 · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1194

Partial Label Learning of RF Emitters with LSTMs

2020· article· en· W2996804334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorComputer scienceRadio frequencyAgile software developmentExploitRadarArtificial intelligenceFrequency modulationIdentification (biology)Modulation (music)Recurrent neural networkClass (philosophy)Artificial neural networkTelecommunicationsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As modern military radars are becoming more agile, Radio Frequency (RF) is becoming less of a discriminator for identification. Along with RF agility, radars that are low probability of intercept (LPI) make consistent detection and measurement of discriminating modulation features more difficult. In light of these challenges, a class of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) called Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks will be demonstrated on a real dataset to exploit the temporal features of measured RF from two ambiguous agile emitters and classify with an accuracy of 92.5%. Future areas of research and application on this topic will be discussed as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it