MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996807102 · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1455

Air Sanitization Using AESA Radar

2020· article· en· W2996807102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarComputer scienceBoundary (topology)Radar trackerRadarAperture (computer memory)Tracking (education)Remote sensingComputer visionTelecommunicationsAcousticsGeologyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a system of modeling an air volume as a collection of cells and computing the cumulative probability of detection at each cell. The paper considers how a cell increases in detection confidence with multiple beams as well as how that confidence degrades over time and in the adjacent presence of other sanitized cells. The paper will make the argument that a sanitized area of sufficient confidence can only degrade at the boundary edge and therefore it is only that area boundary that requires subsequent beam attention. When beams are no longer spent sweeping an area as fast as possible, the result is a sensor that can be used for other activities (e.g. tracking threats, synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mapping) or in reduced detectability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it