MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996855464 · doi:10.1649/0010-065x-73.4.875

Vauricia howdenae Chamorro and Anderson, a New Genus and Species of Rhinostomina from the Oriental Region, with a Key to World Genera of Orthognathini (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Dryophthorinae)

2019· article· en· W2996855464 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Lourdes Chamorro, Robert S. Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Coleopterists Bulletin · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurculionidaeKey (lock)GenusBiologyZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vauricia howdenae Chamorro and Anderson, new genus and new species of Rhinostomina, is described from Malaysia. The new species can be easily distinguished from all other Orthognathini by the uniquely shaped mandibles, the apically wide and medially shallowly emarginate third tarsomere, the subbasally wide pronotum, and the contiguous procoxae, among other characters. We also here retain Yuccaborus LeConte as a distinct genus from Rhinostomus Rafinesque, thus recognizing three genera in the subtribe. An updated key to the world genera of Orthognathini is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Coleopterists BulletinSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207