MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2996907814 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v12n1p1

Analytic Solutions of the Eigenvalues of Mathieu’s Equation

2019· article· en· W2996907814 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chein‐Shan Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsMathematicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsCombinatoricsMatrix (chemical analysis)EigenfunctionMathematical analysisMathieu functionPrime (order theory)Mathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathieu’s eigenvalue problem −y′′(x) + 2e_0 cos(2x)y(x) = λy(x), 0 < x < ℓ is symmetric if cos(2x) = cos(2ℓ − 2x) for ℓ = k0π, k0 ∈ N, and skew-symmetric if cos(2x) = − cos(2ℓ − 2x) for ℓ = π/2. Two typical boundary conditions are considered. When the eigenfunctions are expanded by the orthonormal bases of sine functions or cosine functions, we can derive an n-dimensional matrix eigenvalue problem, endowing with a special structure of the symmetric coefficient matrix A := [a_ij], a_ij = 0 if i + j is an odd integer. Based on it, we can obtain the eigenvalues easily and analytically. When ℓ = k_0π, k_0 ∈ N, we have a_ij = 0 if |i − j| > 2k_0. Besides the diagonal band, A has two off-diagonal bands, and furthermore, a cross band appears when k_0 ≥ 2. The product formula, the recursion formulas of characteristic functions and a fictitious time integration method (FTIM) are developed to find the eigenvalues of Mathieu’s equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207