« Grâce poétique » et œuvre d’art : méditations phénoménologiques dans le Journal de l’analogiste de Suzanne Lilar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article explore le « mécanisme du fonctionnement » de la poésie libérée du verbal moyennant une analyse phénoménologique que le lecteur trouve dans le Journal de l’analogiste de Suzanne Lilar. En passant par les concepts de l’original et de la copie, l’écrivaine belge conceptualise ses propres expériences poétiques et leur « agir symbolique » instable (vécus à différentes époques de sa vie) autour des rapports dialogiques entre l’œuvre d’art, le spectateur-lecteur et l’artiste. Ce dialogue mène l’écrivaine belge à la découverte de correspondances entre les rythmes et formes naturels et les rythmes et formes artistiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it