MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997021525 · doi:10.1353/ajh.2019.0066

Communal Solidarity: Immigration, Settlement, and Social Welfare in Winnipeg's Jewish Community, 1882–1930 by Arthur Ross

2019· article· en· W2997021525 on OpenAlex
Barry L. Stiefel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Jewish history · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolidarityJudaismImmigrationSettlement (finance)SociologyWelfareDemocracyPolitical scienceEconomic historyHistoryLawPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Communal Solidarity: Immigration, Settlement, and Social Welfare in Winnipeg's Jewish Community, 1882–1930 by Arthur Ross Barry L. Stiefel Communal Solidarity: Immigration, Settlement, and Social Welfare in Winnipeg's Jewish Community, 1882–1930. By Arthur Ross. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2019. 327 pp. Few books have been published on Winnipeg's Jews, with Coming of Age: A History of the Jewish People of Manitoba by Allan Gerald Levine (2009) and Arthur A. Chiel's Jews in Manitoba (1961) being representative of past accomplishments. Within the studies of Jewish life [End Page 564] in this region of Canada, there has been divided attention between the Jews who lived in the agricultural communities and those in Winnipeg. Considering that during the twentieth century Winnipeg had Canada's third largest Jewish community, a history exclusively focused on it has been long overdue. Arthur Ross's Communal Solidarity is a social history of the development of Winnipeg's Jewish communal institutions. From the early 1880s through 1930, nearly 10,000 Eastern European Jews made Winnipeg their new home and soon began to establish synagogues, secular mutual aid societies, and other charity-oriented organizations based on egalitarian principles of communal solidarity in order to address economic insecurity for those who still needed it, as well as to bring over family members still in Europe. From this milieu of Jewish organizations evolved a Jewish community interested in democratic participation to guide social welfare that was at this time not well provided by government services. Ross begins his history by contextualizing the socio-political situation of Jews in the Russian Pale of Settlement so that we can understand the push factors for why many Jews came to Winnipeg, which entailed the experience of immigrants with Jewish organizations (religious and secular) in Europe prior to coming to Canada in addition to those that already existed in the country. The ascendancy of secular Yiddish culture in Jewish communal Eastern Europe was perpetuated through the Yiddish theater, Yiddish literature, and Yiddish media, which also influenced social welfare values among the Jews who came to Winnipeg. The social welfare services created by Winnipeg's Yiddish-speaking Jews for immigrants and the destitute included, according to Ross, "income assistance, health care, institutional care for children and the elderly, and immigrant aid to reunite families," which assisted thousands of Jews in Winnipeg as well as many rural communities in western Canada (back cover text). Secular Yiddish social welfare and political organization significantly changed communal Jewish governance away from the religious sphere, which created a culture that expected democratic practices. This is why Jewish free loan societies, mutual aid societies, orphanages, and old age homes succeeded when there was broad community involvement, input, and financial support, instead of dependence on a small oligarchy of philanthropists or leaders. Ross also describes how at the dawn of the twentieth century, Winnipeg was a quickly modernizing city in respect to infrastructure and socio-economic development. Between the 1890s and 1910s trade unions were established, which attracted leftists Russian Jews. Thus, Ross also explains how Jewish participation in the union movement harmed the perception of Jews in the Canadian public eye because they came to be seen as potential socialist trouble makers. [End Page 565] Within Winnipeg's Jewish community there was great internal division. Longer term Canadian Jewish inhabitants disagreed about religious ritual with the more recent inhabitants, a Reform-Orthodox divide which was also accentuated by socio-economic standing and city geography (acculturated Jews in Winnipeg's center and South End, new immigrants in the ethnic North End). Immigrants were also divided among themselves according to geographic origins, such as various Russian-Jewish groups and Jewish Romanians. Because of this there grew to be a great number of synagogues—twenty congregations by 1930, according to Ross—which also led to the duplication of mutual aid, free loan, and other benevolent societies, whose membership comprised an estimated 80% of all Jewish men residing in Winnipeg. These organizations also functioned independently from the communal charities that were dominated by the established Jewish elite. During the late 1910s some of Winnipeg's Jewish charitable societies began to coordinate and collaborate their efforts with national and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it