A New Substorm Onset Mechanism: Increasingly Parallel Pressure Anisotropic Ballooning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent observations demonstrating that auroral beads are observed prior to the majority of substorm onsets (Kalmoni et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071826 ) have reinforced the potential importance of ballooning instabilities for near‐Earth magnetospheric substorm onset. Here we examine pressure anisotropic ballooning instabilities in stretched magnetotail geometries. Our results show that transition from an initially perpendicular anisotropy toward parallel anisotropy reduces the plasma β threshold for triggering a ballooning instability. Such increasingly parallel anisotropies can form as a direct consequence of tail stretching that occurs during the late substorm growth phase through the well‐known effects of drift shell splitting and the competition between betatron and Fermi processes in the tail. We propose such increasingly parallel ballooning triggers auroral substorm onset on field lines in the transition region between dipolar and tail‐like fields, consistent with observational constraints on the location of the onset arc with respect to the ion isotropy boundary in the magnetotail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".