MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997066723

Menciptakan Home Literacy bagi Anak Usia Dini di Era Digital

2017· article· id· W2997066723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eti Nurhayati, Maulidya Ulfah

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2017
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyEarly childhoodFamily literacyDigital literacyCritical literacyEarly childhood educationPsychologyPedagogySociologyDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There has been a change of family in this digital era such as the structure, roles, and responsibilities of parents in early childhood education, including in literacy. The change will continue to occur in family life, but parental responsibility together in child care and education is an ideal condition that must be created in the family, which is not replaced by the technology in this digital era. This paper aims to: (1) identify some changes in family life in the digital era, (2) offer home literacy programs for early childhood in the digital era, including: the urgency of developing literacy for early childhood, the role of parents in home literacy, creating home literacy, and implementing home literacy. Home literacy is an alternative solution for early childhood in developing potential in his/ her golden age. The role of parents in home literacy are to provide means and facilities, to design the environment at home, and actively to engage in literacy activities as a mentor or friend in the activity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood educationSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207