Normes de préparation de produits stériles en pharmacie au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The production of sterile preparations requires a strict regulatory framework in order to standardize and optimize aseptic techniques. In spring 2014, the Ordre des pharmaciens du Québec has reviewed its existing guidelines and published two new standards for sterile preparations. Several recommendations and modifications have been added to the existing 1995 standard to provide greater public protection, including the use of the required protective garb, strict aseptic procedures and determination of the Beyond-Use Date of the preparations. Two independent standards are now available for pharmacists who supervise the production of sterile preparations in Quebec. One concerns non-hazardous sterile preparations (standard 2014.01) and the other concern hazardous sterile preparations (standard 2014.02). Pharmacist involved in this type of practice must be familiar with the various aspects of these standards in order to maintain the quality and to minimize microbial and chemical contamination. It is also important to ensure the safety of the assigned personnel to the compounding of hazardous sterile preparations which must fully respect the requirements to avoid significant risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".