El amor cristiano en la <i>Tragicomedia</i> de Fernando de Rojas y en la <i>Segunda Celestina</i> de Feliciano de Silva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo se propone explorar la percepción del amor en el contexto cristiano, con el intento de reconocer la implementación y los cambios de costumbres que se evidencian en dos producciones literarias que tienen como protagonista a Celestina: la Tragicomedia de Calisto y Melibea de Fernando de Rojas y la Segunda Celestina de Feliciano de Silva. La hipótesis central de este ensayo considera que entre la escritura de Rojas y la de Silva, tanto el mal de amor como la conquista de la amada sufren gradualmente un proceso de evolución. Nos referimos a una acentuación de los valores y los fundamentos cristianos reconocidos en la época como primordiales; de tal manera que ocurre una conversión de la trama central, acercando la segunda obra hacia la noción cristiana de amor, como parte del ideal matrimonial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".