MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997114545

Don’t Have a Cow, Flanders: Guidance for the European Court of Justice as it Considers the Flemish Parliament’s Ban on Ritual Slaughter

2019· article· en· W2997114545 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlemishConstitutionalityLawPolitical scienceCharterEconomic JusticeParliamentPrerogativeAppealEuropean court of justiceCLARITYEuropean Union lawSupreme courtEuropean unionHistoryBusinessPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the European Court of Justice poised to determine the Constitutionality of the Flemish ban on ritual slaughter, the Court’s ultimate decision will have wide-ranging ramifications for all of Europe. The Court’s task of ultimately having to determine the proper balance between animal welfare and religious liberty involves having the clarity to see through the racist sentiments on clear display throughout Belgium, and separate clear science from pseudo-science. The Court should draw upon the ways the United States and Canada have addressed this conflict, as well as carefully analyze the protections outlined in the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. Ultimately, it should strike down Belgium’s new restrictions on ritual slaughter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it