Does institutional ownership moderate the effect of intellectual capital and company value?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to empirically examine the influence of intellectual capital towards company value and also its influence while being moderated by institutional ownership. This study uses purposive sampling to determine samples from manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the year of 2014–2018. The total sample obtained in this study is 301 from the 720 population of data throughout the research year. Data analysis techniques use multiple regression and moderated regression analysis (MRA) methods. The results of this study show that Intellectual Capital has a positive significant effect on company value while institutional ownership does not have a significant effect on moderating the influence of intellectual capital towards company value. The practical implication of this study is to provide information to managers or owners of public manufacturing companies and investors about the importance of intangible assets investment like intellectual capital as the competitive strategies to achieve more optimal company value, as well as for regulator to make clear regulations about the disclosures of intangible assets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it