The satisfaction of parents with ambulatory polyclinic care of children in conditions of the region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To identify the most effective areas of out-patient care of children, an in-depth sociological study was carried out in the Kabardino-Balkaria Republic. The questionnaire allowed to get answers on satisfaction of parents with the quality, volume and availability of out-patient care, as well as to study the social status of respondents. The survey included 495 mothers aged of 18-45 years. Out of them, 70.0% had 1-2 children, 30.0% had 3 or more children. The orientation of the majority of families to the birth of 1-2 children formed one of the lowest in the republics of the North Caucasus total fertility rate of 1.61. The results of the study of parental satisfaction with the level of medical care of children in out-patient settings established that the main problem is sufficiently correlated with the data of similar studies in different regions of Russia. According to the data obtained, 61.0% of the respondents were satisfied with the overall health care in the clinic, and only 12.0% of the respondents were fully satisfied. At the same time, a quarter of the respondents expressed their dissatisfaction with various aspects of medical care. The main reasons for dissatisfaction are the low level of examination, organizational issues that need to be addressed, a significant workload of doctors, often the lack of doctors of narrow specialties. According to parents opinion, the clinic is lacking continuity in the work and dynamic monitoring of a sick child, as well as awareness of patients about the ongoing therapeutic and preventive measures. The low efficiency of preventive work is established. The dissatisfaction with the availability and quality of medical care of children is the basis for the necessary measures to improve functioning of the children's clinic, including introduction of new and effective organizational and medical technologies, improvement of material and technical equipment, improvement of the professionalism of medical personnel. The prerequisite for the success of the clinic is also compliance with ethical principles in Pediatrics. The results obtained on the basis of the analysis of the parents' opinion are valuable for development of the perspective programs of development and improvement of primary health care of children in the Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".