Possible Means to Overcome Tendencies of the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty to Erode the NPT
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the United Nations General Assembly has adopted the text of a ‘Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons’, chances for its implementation are slim. Almost all (declared or de facto) nuclear-weapon States are planning to enlarge or to modernise their arsenals, and both Russia and the United States have developed postures that revive Cold War scenarios. In such an environment, tendencies eroding the NPT regime must be countered. The most promising option appears to be to advocate for more dialogue and confidence building. Many non-nuclear-weapon States have a vital interest to promote this approach and ought to cooperate in facilitating such a process. The contribution discusses the options under international law of progressive improvement within and outside the new Ban Treaty which might contribute to the obligation to strive for a comprehensive prohibition of nuclear arms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it