Sanctions in Nuclear Non-Proliferation Law
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taking stock of the discussion on the measures to be taken against States not complying with existing obligations in the field of nuclear non-proliferation contained in the Fourth Report on Legal Aspects of the Use of Nuclear Energy for Peaceful Purposes presented by the Committee on Nuclear Weapons, Non-Proliferation & Contemporary International Law to the ILA Sydney Conference (2018), this chapter suggests three possible avenues to deal with such States. The first avenue is the UN Charter and the possibility that the recalcitrant Member State’s membership rights be suspended or that its membership be severed permanently (expulsion). The second avenue centres on the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and how its provisions might be invoked to address prohibited nuclear proliferation by Contracting Parties. The third avenue concerns the domestic legislation of certain States, which permits the adoption of the so-called ‘autonomous sanctions’, separately and independently of enforcement action ordered by international organisations, and in furtherance of foreign policy objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it