In Situ Proteolysis Condition-Induced Crystallization of the XcpVWX Complex in Different Lattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although prevalent in the determination of protein structures; crystallography always has the bottleneck of obtaining high-quality protein crystals for characterizing a wide range of proteins; especially large protein complexes. Stable fragments or domains of proteins are more readily to crystallize; which prompts the use of in situ proteolysis to remove flexible or unstable structures for improving crystallization and crystal quality. In this work; we investigated the effects of in situ proteolysis by chymotrypsin on the crystallization of the XcpVWX complex from the Type II secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Different proteolysis conditions were found to result in two distinct lattices in the same crystallization solution. With a shorter chymotrypsin digestion at a lower concentration; the crystals exhibited a P3 hexagonal lattice that accommodates three complex molecules in one asymmetric unit. By contrast; a longer digestion with chymotrypsin of a 10-fold higher concentration facilitated the formation of a compact P212121 orthorhombic lattice with only one complex molecule in each asymmetric unit. The molecules in the hexagonal lattice have shown high atomic displacement parameter values compared with the ones in the orthorhombic lattice. Taken together; our results clearly demonstrate that different proteolysis conditions can result in the generation of distinct lattices in the same crystallization solution; which can be exploited in order to obtain different crystal forms of a better quality
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".