MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997396766 · doi:10.7203/celestinesca.43.20241

<i>La Celestina</i> (1499) cinco siglos más tarde: ecos celestinescos en <i>Tiempo de Silencio</i> (1962)

2019· article· es· W2997396766 on OpenAlex
Irene López Rodríguez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCelestinesca · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Culture and Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pesar de haber transcurrido cinco siglos entre La Celestina (1499) y Tiempo de silencio (1962), resuenan con fuerza ecos celestinescos en la composición de la novela de posguerra, especialmente en la caracterización de su principal ramera. En efecto, para elaborar el retrato de Doña Luisa, Luis Martín Santos usa como modelo a la Celestina de Fernando de Rojas. Los cuadros literarios de ambas proxenetas destacan por sus notables semejanzas en cuanto a sus descripciones físicas y psicológicas, sus múltiples oficios, sus onomásticas, sus moradas y vestimentas, vinculaciones con la nigromancia y el infierno, así como en cuanto a los personajes que las rodean. Siguiendo la senda trazada por su antecesor medieval, el novelista contemporáneo se adentra en el mundo de la prostitución para reflejar la profunda crisis de valores que azota a la sociedad española durante la dictadura franquista.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it