<i>La Celestina</i> (1499) cinco siglos más tarde: ecos celestinescos en <i>Tiempo de Silencio</i> (1962)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pesar de haber transcurrido cinco siglos entre La Celestina (1499) y Tiempo de silencio (1962), resuenan con fuerza ecos celestinescos en la composición de la novela de posguerra, especialmente en la caracterización de su principal ramera. En efecto, para elaborar el retrato de Doña Luisa, Luis Martín Santos usa como modelo a la Celestina de Fernando de Rojas. Los cuadros literarios de ambas proxenetas destacan por sus notables semejanzas en cuanto a sus descripciones físicas y psicológicas, sus múltiples oficios, sus onomásticas, sus moradas y vestimentas, vinculaciones con la nigromancia y el infierno, así como en cuanto a los personajes que las rodean. Siguiendo la senda trazada por su antecesor medieval, el novelista contemporáneo se adentra en el mundo de la prostitución para reflejar la profunda crisis de valores que azota a la sociedad española durante la dictadura franquista.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".