MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997410963 · doi:10.3390/rs12010135

Multi-View Features Joint Learning with Label and Local Distribution Consistency for Point Cloud Classification

2020· article· en· W2997410963 on OpenAlexaff
Guofeng Tong, Yong Li, Dong Chen, Shaobo Xia, Jiju Peethambaran, Yuebin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceLidarArtificial intelligenceConsistency (knowledge bases)Discriminative modelPattern recognition (psychology)Subspace topologyFeature vectorOutlierFeature (linguistics)Point (geometry)Remote sensingMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In outdoor Light Detection and Ranging (lidar)point cloud classification, finding the discriminative features for point cloud perception and scene understanding represents one of the great challenges. The features derived from defect-laden (i.e., noise, outliers, occlusions and irregularities) and raw outdoor LiDAR scans usually contain redundant and irrelevant information which adversely affects the accuracy of point semantic labeling. Moreover, point cloud features of different views have a capability to express different attributes of the same point. The simplest way of concatenating these features of different views cannot guarantee the applicability and effectiveness of the fused features. To solve these problems and achieve outdoor point cloud classification with fewer training samples, we propose a novel multi-view features and classifiers’ joint learning framework. The proposed framework uses label consistency and local distribution consistency of multi-space constraints for multi-view point cloud features extraction and classification. In the framework, the manifold learning is used to carry out subspace joint learning of multi-view features by introducing three kinds of constraints, i.e., local distribution consistency of feature space and position space, label consistency among multi-view predicted labels and ground truth, and label consistency among multi-view predicted labels. The proposed model can be well trained by fewer training points, and an iterative algorithm is used to solve the joint optimization of multi-view feature projection matrices and linear classifiers. Subsequently, the multi-view features are fused and used for point cloud classification effectively. We evaluate the proposed method on five different point cloud scenes and experimental results demonstrate that the classification performance of the proposed method is at par or outperforms the compared algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207