MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2997423838 · doi:10.1353/lan.2019.0087

Special Issue on Indigenous Languages: Introduction

2019· article· en· W2997423838 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousLinguisticsSelection (genetic algorithm)HistoryDiversity (politics)Indigenous languageSociologyComputer scienceAnthropologyArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Special Issue on Indigenous Languages: Introduction Sarah G. Thomason The year 2019 was established as the International Year of Indigenous Languages (IYIL) by the United Nations General Assembly. The goal was to call attention to the risks faced by indigenous languages all over the world and to promote the maintenance and revitalization of threatened languages in order to reduce the likelihood of a catastrophic global loss of linguistic diversity. This is a two-part Special Issue of Language that highlights the contributions made by linguists to understanding the history, structures, and use of indigenous languages, as reflected in the Linguistic Society of America’s flagship journal Language. The issue is divided by date: articles published in the twentieth century, from the journal’s first volume in 1925 through volume 75 (1999), are in the first volume, and twenty-first-century articles, from volume 76 (2000) through volume 95 (2019), are in the second. This introduction covers both.1 In spite of the chronological imbalance, the two volumes contain roughly the same number of articles. The uneven number of Language issues covered by each volume is meant to emphasize the fact that more and more linguists have been investigating indigenous languages in recent decades. The selection of articles to include in the Special Issue was based on two main criteria: geographical distribution of the languages represented in the articles and topical distribution across linguistic subdisciplines. An additional criterion, especially in the twentieth-century volume, was authorship; many of the most illustrious names in our field appear here. No author appears more than once, though a few of the languages do. All but a very few of the languages included are endangered, and one of them, Chitimacha (Swadesh 1934), lost its last native speaker in 1940. At least two of the languages that are not classed as endangered, Huichol (Hamp 1957) and Seri (Baerman 2016), are ‘vulnerable’ according to UNESCO’s Atlas of the world’s languages in danger (Moseley 2010). In the first several decades of the Linguistic Society of America, the overwhelming majority of Language articles on indigenous languages focused on languages spoken in the United States and Canada; in second place were languages of Latin America. Indigenous languages elsewhere in the world were represented very sparsely indeed in the journal. Global coverage has expanded greatly in the last few decades, but the Americas still predominate. Together, in a pared-down selection from the total list of Language articles with indigenous language material, the Americas accounted for 136 languages, while only forty-two languages represented the rest of the world. Given the early dominance of New World languages, the twentieth-century volume mostly comprises articles on languages of the Americas, especially North America, so that geographical balance in the Special Issue has been achieved (though only partially) by a concentration in the twenty-first-century volume on languages of other continents. The Special Issue contains twenty-two US and Canadian languages, fourteen Latin American languages, eight languages of northern Eurasia, five African languages, three Australian [End Page e474] languages, two languages of Oceania (one of which, Chamorro (Chung 1983), is spoken on Guam, a US territory), two languages of Papua New Guinea, and one United Kingdom language. Two of the languages included in the Special Issue are mixed languages: Chinook Jargon (Jacobs 1932), a pidgin language that flourished in the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, British Columbia) in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and Light Warlpiri (O’Shannessy 2013), a bilingual mixed language that emerged very recently in Australia. Unsurprisingly, the most-discussed topics are core areas of linguistic structure: morphology and syntax (twenty-nine articles) and phonetics and phonology (fifteen articles). Nine articles focus on endangered languages, seven of them in the set edited by the late Ken Hale (Hale et al. 1992). Other areas represented in the Special Issue are historical linguistics (six articles), semantics (three articles), sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics (two articles each), and general description (two articles, both from the journal’s earliest years). The specific topics range widely, including articles comparing language groups (both historical and typological studies, eight in all) and articles on glottalized continuants (Sapir 1938), language death (Dorian 1978), switch-reference (Austin 1981...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it